![]() Jerald Mason - Senior Executive who encouraged Lund to reassess his decision not to launch. Joe Kilminster - Engineer in a management position McDonald Roger Boisjoly - Engineer who worked under McDonald Robert Ebeling - Engineer who worked under Morton Thiokol - Contracted by NASA to build the Solid Rocket BoosterĪlan McDonald - Director of the Solid Rocket Motors Project Larry Mulloy - Challenged the engineers' decision not to launch Marshall Space Flight Center - In charge of booster rocket development The failure of the O-ring was attributed to several factors, including faulty design of the solid rocket boosters, insufficient low temperature testing of the O-ring material and the joints that the O-ring sealed, and lack of communication between different levels of NASA management. The failure of the solid rocket booster O-rings to seat properly allowed hot combustion gases to leak from the side of the booster and burn through the external fuel tank. On January 28, 1986, seven astronauts were killed when the space shuttle they were piloting, the Challenger, exploded just over a minute into flight. SHOULD NASA HAVE DONE ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY IN THEIR LAUNCH DECISION PROCEDURE? Student Handout - Synopsis #Nasa space shuttle accidents professional#WHAT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES WERE NEGLECTED, IF ANY? ![]() HOW DOES THE IMPLIED SOCIAL CONTRACT OF PROFESSIONALS APPLY TO THIS CASE? What do you (the students) see as your future engineering professional responsibilities in relation to both being loyal to management and protecting the public welfare? KEY ISSUES ![]() What should Roger Boisjoly have done differently (if anything)? In answering this question, keep in mind that at his age, the prospect of finding a new job if he was fired was slim. What, if anything, could their subordinates have done differently?ģ. What could NASA management have done differently?Ģ. Their titles are, respectively: "Ethics and Professionalism in Engineering: Why the Interest in Engineering Ethics? " "Basic Concepts and Methods in Ethics," "Moral Concepts and Theories," and "Engineering Design: Literature on Social Responsibility Versus Legal Liability." Questions for Class Discussionġ. In addition, essays #1 through #4 appended at the end of the cases in this report will have relevant background information for the instructor preparing to lead classroom discussion. A final point is the fact that no matter how far removed from the public an engineer may think she is, all of her actions have potential impact.Įssay #6, "Loyalty and Professional Rights" appended at the end of the case listings in this report will be found relevant for instructors preparing to lead class discussion on this case. ![]() The issues covered in the student handout include the importance of an engineer's responsibility to public welfare, the need for this responsibility to hold precedence over any other responsibilities the engineer might have and the responsibilities of a manager/engineer. Reserve about half of the class period for an open discussion of the issues. In class the details of the case can be reviewed with the aide of the overheads. Prior to class discussion, ask the students to read the student handout outside of class. The failure of the O-ring was attributed to several factors, including faulty design of the solid rocket boosters, insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and the joints that the O-ring sealed, and lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA management. On January 28, 1986, seven astronauts were killed when the space shuttle they were piloting, the Challenger, exploded just over a minute into the flight. Instructor's Guide Introduction To The Case ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |